Reflecting on the ADM

The National Union of Journalists’ Annual Delegate Meeting, other than being a right mouthful to say out loud, was an incredibly eye-opening experience for me.

Having spent the past two years studying a journalism degree, and painfully aware that the not-so-free ride is coming to an end, it was a great opportunity to talk to the people who are not only part of the industry, but also suffering from it’s apparently drawn out murder.

There were inspirations – James Doherty leaving every student still left in the bar at three in the morning on Friday night (that was most, then) open-mouthed and inspired by his shocking tales from Gaza; Foster Dongozi from the Zimbabwe Union of Journalists making me realise just how vital ethical journalism is in a country where a brutal death at the hands of the government is your punishment for telling the truth; and the shared attitude of resilience that clearly holds the union together in a time where the only people who really care about journalism are the journalists themselves.

But with the moments of inspiration came snatches of self-doubt, of intense worry and the kind of feeling a novice mountaineer would get in his gut upon facing Everest.

I once heard journalism described as ‘a rich person’s hobby’. Indeed, a few days after getting back from the surprisingly delightful Southport, I attended the Guardian Student Media Conference, where the ‘Make It In Media’ panel consisted of the winner of last year’s Broadcast Journalist of the Year award and two Oxford graduates now working for the Guardian.

Perhaps not realising who the audience was, Aditya Chakrabortty explained how he got into the industry when the interview for his first job was chaired by another member of that ‘old boys club’. Despite knowing little in the role he was applying for, the only question in that interview that seemed to matter was ‘what college did you study at?’ He laughed it off whilst all the students listening audibly let out a resigned sigh of despair.

But there was one conversation I had towards the end of the weekend at ADM that has spurred me on. Ken Smith, chair of the NUJ Wales Council, told me all about his ambitious plans to organise a sort of local co-op of newspapers in Wales. He plans to work out a solution to the problems local news is facing, rather than whinging about it. What’s more he told me that there is a place for students in his scheme, and those students will be paid fairly for their work. Whilst his enthusiasm was encouraging, it was his attitude to students that made me realise that not everyone in this industry is looking for some cheap labour to abuse.

It’s hard to believe in yourself in journalism. Every time I tell someone what I’m studying, I get incredulous looks and jokes about taking photos up some poor starlet’s skirt as she tumbles out of her car. But I feel I took one of the greatest things from the ADM over the weekend – inspiration to not only make it in this career, but make the industry better than it has ever been before. Ambitious, yes, but there can be no success without ambition.

It’s either that or I invent a time machine and go study at Oxford.

Interview with Christine Buckley, Journalist editor

Posted via email from Kat’s posterous

Pictures from the dinner last night now up

Pictures of delegates enjoying Saturday night’s dinner and dancing now up on our flickr slideshow (links to photo page).
NUJ ADM Gala Dinner

ADM begins on Sunday morning…

Wot no delegates?
Empty seats at the start of the final day at NUJ ADM 2009

Interview with Antonya Allen, George Viner Memorial Fund student

The Journalist (NUJ Journal) – Motions 133 – 140

Order paper 12 – including motions 133 to 140 – was introduced with a short speech condemning the current Journalist site and praising the reporting carried out by students at the NUJ’s Annual Delegate Meeting (ADM).

All motions concerned the role of new editor of the Journalist, Christine Buckley, and the state of the Journalist magazine.

Richard Simcox, from the Press and PR branch, said: “We’re really lagging behind in terms of how we run things. We could, and probably should be, following the students’ examples.”

All motions were passed of which motion 133 (covering motion 134) was unopposed.

Motion 133 – Increasing the role of the Journalist editor

Motion 133 (covering Motion 134), proposed by Press and PR branch, discussed the issues of convergence and the role of the editor of the Journalist (the NUJ Journal). It passed unanimously.

Under current NUJ guidelines the editor only has power to edit articles in the journal and those online which have been taken directly from the journal.

In the motion the ADM instructed the National Executive Council (NEC) to:

  • Change the NUJ rules to increase the editor’s role – via a motion at next years’ ADM – to expand his/her responsibilities to editing all Journalistic news pieces on the website
  • This will mean that the editor will have additional control over “union and other website pages” involving content taken from, or associated with, the union’s journal
  • He/she will not have control over the whole site

In order to make the Journalist more prominent among members.

Leeds branch proposed an amendment to the motion arguing that a clause confirming the role of the editor as an “independent elected editor” – and giving them responsibility for all NUJ website content – would clarify the motion.

Press and PR branch asked conference to reject the amendment made by Leeds branch as gives the editor too much power. The amendment was rejected by a massive majority.

Motion 135 – Concerns over the frequency of the Journalist and lack of co-operation between the journal and the online content

Motion 135 (covering motion 136 to 140) – proposed by North Wales Coast, Manchester, Birmingham and Coventry branches – concerned worries that the ADM has with the communications strategy imposed by the NEC and the cutting of regular Journalist issues.

The motion outlined that the Journalist has been cut to six issues a year and that communications between all sectors of the Union are being damaged by cut-backs and incoherent publishing of online material – which is often not published in concert with the news in the Journalist.

The motion instructs the NEC to:

  • Ensure that the website includes a daily link to the Journalist is displayed so users are aware of the journal
  • To integrate the editor of the Journalist into the Union’s Campaigns and Communications department to ensure unity

Leeds branch proposed an amendment to the motion saying there should be a further section on the NUJ website specifically for unrelated Journalist matters. This was proposed to prevent a converging mess on the internet.

Peter Lazenby, from Leeds branch, urged that the amendment be passed. He said: “In the current state the Journalist – which is our trade press – is inadequate. We have to sort out the online section with the journal and get members involved. First that means highlighting the independence of the Journalist.”

The amendment was rejected by an overwhelming majority and the motion was passed.

Ethical Decisions

War-zone reporting, and the police’s relationship with journalists were some of the many topics put under the microscope when the conference returned from lunch.

The Law of the Land

With regards to journalists’ relationship with the police, motions 86 through to 92 were discussed. In 86 (covering also 87, 88, 89) the efforts, and subsequent legal victory of Sunday Tribune Northern editor Suzanne Breen were applauded and used as an example of why it is imperative for the NEC to “contact police forces in the UK and Ireland to emphasise to them the importance of the NUJ Code Of Conduct”.

With 90, the NEC was urged to continue its ongoing attempts to improve relations with the Police, while 91 focused on how relations were severely damaged by the heavy-handed treatment of journalists (especially photographers) by the police at the G20 demonstrations in London.

Motion 92 on the other hand, dealt with the flippant attitude in which the Police have adopted with the Police And Criminal Evidence Act (PACE Act) and other legislation, thanks to the recent glut of anti-terrorism laws. It proposes that the NEC produce a ‘legal guide’ in which NUJ members can refer to , so as that they know exactly how protected they and their work are, should they ever come under the scrutiny of a police investigation or arrest.

All four motions were passed without incident.

The Misrepresentation of Women in the Media

Another successfully carried motion was that of Bristol Branch, in which, based on the findings of the “Representations of Women in the Media” project, the NEC were urged to promote positive representations of women in the media, and to tackle and debunk the misrepresentations.

Disability and Permission to report

The reporting of stories involving people with disabilities was the focus of both motion 108 and 110. Motion 108 wanted every member to recognise that people with disabilities were a growing population, not only in the general population, but in the NUJ as well.

As a result, it wanted to raise awareness of the importance of sensitivity when writing, and courtesy when dealing with affected members at work. 110 was more interested in the terminology used when reporting on ‘hate crimes against disabled people’, and how words such as ‘vulnerable’ could actually be detrimental to the victims as it creates a weak stereotype that many people could and do find offensive and demeaning. Both motions were carried.

Motion 109 wanted to amend the NUJ Code of Conduct to include the principle that “journalists should seek the permission of a parent, guardian, or other appropriate adult when interviewing or photographing a child with regard to a story about their welfare”. This motion was also passed.

War on Error

The big debate of this section was Oxford and District Branch’s statement that a majority of the British media was guilty of bias reporting on the latest Gaza conflict, and that the NEC  should set up a forum to discuss the ethical rights and wrongs on the reporting of the conflict.

This received passionate backing on both sides of the debate, with members from BBC World Service defending the coverage, and other NUJ members condemning it. Despite BBC World Service’s protestations, the motion was passed (with the branch’s own amendment).

Remission Possible

Not all motions were as successful as most, with motions:

  • 93 (campaign to reform the PCC)
  • 111 (reinstatement of former clause 8of the original Code Of Conduct)
  • 113 (bridging the gap between the journalistic principles of the NUJ, and the new medias of blogging and twittering)

all remitted for the NEC to make a decision.

Military protest may lead to life sentence

Attendees at the Media Workers Against the War fringe meeting heard a discussion of the British military position in Afghanistan.

By Stephen Fothergill and Julija Jegorova.

Speaking at the meeting were photographer Guy Smallman, who recently returned from Afghanistan, Nahella Ashraf, who chairs the Manchester branch of Stop the War, and Sue Glenton, mother of British soldier Joe Glenton.

Sue Glenton

Sue Glenton is the mother of British soldier Joe Glenton, who refused to go back to war in Afghanistan on a matter of principle and ethics.

She said: “When Joe was sent to Afghanistan he believed he would be helping to liberate women, stop the opium trade and bring down the warlords. Instead he found himself in a war of attrition which has led to the death of countless innocent people.”

She added that until he sent his letter to Gordon Brown on 30th July 2009, he was up on charges of being Awol, which allows sentencing of up to two years in prison.

He is now up on the more serious charge of desertion which carries a maximum life sentence. She said: “We’re supposedly fighting in Afghanistan for democracy, really I think we should be fighting for our democracy over here.”

Guy SmallmanGuest speakers at the Media Workers Against the War fringe meeting. By David Hedges

Guy Smallman spoke about his time in Afghanistan during the recent November elections. He expressed his dismay with Afghan democracy by saying: “I couldn’t find a single Afghan person who is happy with politics. They believe that their President was elected earlier in the White House.”

He went on to say that he believes that the war is doing nothing to help the Afghan people. Many people are far worse off than before the war started. He said: “Some people have to sell their children to feed their families.”

Stop the War

Nahella Ashraf, Chair of Manchester Stop the War, began her speech by reminding the audience of the main reasons Britain had gone to war.

She said: “We were told that we were looking for Osama Bin Laden dead or alive and to end Al-Qaeda’s movement.”

Other justifications for the war were to promote democracy and to fight for the rights of women in Afghanistan. She argued that this had not happened and in fact in many cases people were far worse off.

She said: “The support fDiscussion during the fringe meeting. By David Hedgesor the Taliban is growing. This doesn’t mean that the Afghan people support them, but rather they support anyone who fights against the people who are killing young men, woman and children.”

Links (open in new windows):

http://www.mancsagainsttanks.org/

www.stopwar.org.uk

Election Results

Journalist editorial board

133 papers, 3 spoiled

Brophy 73

Chapman 43

Conn 38

Gosling/White 85

Hammond 40

Harcup 68

Hunt 29

McCann 22

O’Neill 84

Quinlan 69

Youett 39

Professional Training

134 papers, 5 spoiled

Frost 97

Hammond 41

Harcup 62

McGowan-Lowe 40

Norris 85

Peasey 56

Theopilou 37

Wajid 68

Wheal 97

European Federation Steering Committee

134 papers 5 spoiled

Barsby 28

Fairley 11

Gosling 11

White 79

Emergency Committee

134 papers 3 spoiled

Barsby 31

Boumelha 79

Connolly 54

Davies 45

Delong 58

Lezard 93

Murray 78

Sutcliffe 37

Pensioners Committee

134 paper, 11 spoiled

Coltart 103

Foot 77

Flatt 36

Harckness 96

Healy 101

Jones 69

Norris 109

TUC Delegation

133 papers 2 spoiled

Beake 30

Davies 71

Delong 71

Halpin 92

Jewell 11

Norris 65

Equality (corrected)

134 papers 2 spoiled

Abouzeid 27

Charles 25

Coltart 83

Connolly 62

Elliott 3

Geraghty 61

Hammond 15

Healy 78

Jewell 9

Jones 27

Katwa 36

Keeping 8

McHenry 34

Moran 33

Ran 72

Smith 13

Tazib 30

Zaba 77

IFJ Triennial Congress

134 papers 5 spoiled

Barsby 41

Boumelha 95

Fairley 29

Maisokwadzo 24

Norris 58

Preston 3

Ran 66

White 93

Workman 21

Women’s TUC

Coltart 106

Cuddihy 44

Halpin 93

Hunt 50

Ladbrook 57

Neysmith 41

Rasbash 74

Disabled Members

130 papers 24 spoiled

Coghlan 85

Jones 17

Leak 30

Thornton 30

Leak and Thornton have agreed to job share

Welsh delegates ready for fightback

NUJ ADM Southport Delegate Ken Smith
WELSH members of the National Union of Journalists (NUJ) are fighting back despite the “UK media ignoring and patronising Wales.”

Dangerous

Meic Birtwistle, National Executive Council member for Wales, told delegates Welsh democracy was suffering as the result of a lack of resources for Welsh journalists and London news outlets turning a blind eye to Wales.

“There is a dangerous situation in Wales,” said Birtwistle.

“Our society pays through the lack of representation, our democracy pays in terms of accountability, our journalists in job cuts but we are fighting back.”

Outpost

And Ken Smith, Chair of NUJ Wales Council, said the London media treated Wales as a colonial outpost.

He told us only the News of the World still maintains a journalist to cover Wales out of all the London papers, which had left parts of Wales as an information desert, and the Big Issue Cymru has moved production to Scotland.

Fightback

But Smith, who has lost his own job as a sub-editor at a regional Welsh newspaper in the last year, was ready to try new ways to resurrect Welsh media and democracy.

“We are looking to form an organic local news network in Wales based on a journalists’ co-operative, much like an actors co-op,” he said.

Smith also said any cooperative would be able to offer NUJ rates of pay and give journalists the environment to flourish without the pressure of a organisation obsessed with delivering profits to shareholders.